On the primary day, Pakistan’s wicketkeeper Mohammad Rizwan was sent back to structure in spite of the replay appearing that the bowler had no portion of the foot behind the line.
The taking after day, the umpires missed an add up to of 21 no-balls bowled by Pakistani bowlers, This was revealed by Hashtag 7 Cricket writer, who pointed out that this is often an ICC issue more than the blame of the umpires or the bowlers.
The as it were no-ball that was called out was the one on which Naseem Shah expelled David Warner when he crossed his half-century, Taking after that call, Naseem did not bowl a no-ball.
It’s critical to note a slant here that since none of the no-balls were called, the Pakistani bowlers kept running in with the supposition that their conveyances were reasonable.
In any case, on the off chance that they had taken a wicket on any of the 21 unlawful conveyances, the choice would have been overturned, Additionally, in case you think from the batting team’s point of view, that’s 21 runs being deducted from their total.
Former Australian captain Rickey Ponting claimed that umpires ought to be more mindful and ICC should come up with a solution, I don’t fault the umpires since on the off chance that they provide it as a no-ball and a wicket falls at that point the choice cannot be toppled.
But 21 erroneous choice isn’t great sufficient, There are cameras that are set up; it takes half a moment to hand-off the data from the third umpire to the on-field umpire then why not use that as an option?